Ebunolu Akintade’s Attempt to Conceal Shady Past: Copyright Scam Uncovered
Ebunolu Akintade has tried concealing negative reviews and information online through impersonation, fraud, cybercrime, and perjury. This involved intentionally filing a false DMCA takedown notice with Google.
Ebunolu Akintade’s copyright takedown notice to Google appeared deceptive, accompanied by a fraudulent “original article” designed to mislead. Recent years have seen extensive research by Lumen Database and other organizations into such fraudulent practices.
Our assessment of Ebunolu Akintade is notably critical, portraying them as a suspicious figure resorting to perjury, impersonation, and fraud to manipulate their reputation or the absence thereof.
Did You Know?
Perjury Laws deals with false statements and representations in the court of law.
Both State and Federal level of courts find perjury law as a felony. A person guilty of perjury may face up to 5 years of imprisonment in the United States.
ABOUT EBUNOLU AKINTADE
Ebunolu Akintade, seemingly believing in lawless profiteering, faced severe consequences for such actions. Google and other reputable websites became victims of fraudulent activities by Akintade, who showed no hesitation in violating perjury laws, engaging in cybercrime, and disregarding various civil regulations.
Fake DMCAs
Ebunolu Akintade endeavors in a deceptive copyright takedown.
A millennium of reputation can hinge on one critical moment. Ebunolu Akintade seems uneasy about sensitive online information and is taking steps. This article delves into the incident, exploring the discovery of fake takedown requests, uncovering motives behind DMCA process abuse, and examining potential repercussions of coordinated takedown efforts.
| Type | Details |
|---|---|
| Sender(s) | Tomas Ross |
| Date | May 07, 2021 |
| Fake Links | https://readsector.com/former-bbc-broadcaster-gaslighted-his-estate-agent-ex-boyfriend/ |
| Original Links Targeted | https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8517117/Former-BBC-broadcaster-gaslighted-estate-agent-ex-boyfriend.html |
| Lumen Database Records | https://lumendatabase.org/notices/23712737 |
Fake DMCAs at Lumen database
After a thorough investigation, I discovered nearly 2,700 fraudulent DMCA notices submitted to Google. This scheme aims to misuse takedowns, suppressing genuine news stories online. Revealing these concealed abuses of our digital legal system was part of my ongoing research into counterfeit copyright claims.
WHAT WERE THEY HIDING?
The nature of their concealment remains unknown, but it could range from a negative review or unfavorable opinion to potential legal troubles like a lawsuit or arrest.
In the coming days, we’ll unveil the details—whatever they wished to keep under wraps. It will be shared across various free-speech platforms, forming a lasting online archive.
Witness the Streisand effect in action.
The discovered notices utilize the “back-dated article” technique. In this approach, the sender (or copier) of the erroneous notice generates a replica of a “true original” article, back-dating it to create a “fake original.” This duplicated article, initially appearing to precede the true original, is presented as the “original” in DMCA notices dispatched to online service providers.
By falsely asserting that the backdated article is the legitimate one, the senders request the takedown of the true original, alleging it to be the copied or “infringing” content. Following the DMCA request, the sender removes the fake original URL, likely ensuring the article doesn’t remain online. If the takedown succeeds, legitimate speech disappears from the internet.
Cyber Crime, Impersonation, Perjury, and Fraud
Recently, it was discovered through the Google Transparency Report that a negative review of Ebunolu Akintade had been taken down from the Google Search Index or an attempt was made to remove it following the submission of a fake DMCA notice to Google. Typical common elements in such instances include the sending of a takedown notice, often a DMCA notice, to the host of the online content or to a search engine like Google.
The notice targets the original version of the material for removal or delisting. However, the content claimed to be the original in the notice is, in fact, a copy, and it was published online after the original material.
In some cases, the copier goes to the extent of creating a fictitious website to host their copy, mimicking a newspaper, magazine, or other online publication. However, the domain of such a site typically has questionable origins.
It’s important to note that the sender of the takedown notice lacks the copyright or any rights to the material in question. The motivations behind the sender’s actions vary but may involve both financial gain and censorship.
Lumen conducted pilot research on this phenomenon a few years ago and is currently revisiting the topic. The goal is to gain a deeper understanding of the phenomenon and develop methods to recognize this type of notice earlier, possibly even automatically, without extensive detective work on domain registration dates, page creation timelines, and other details.
Exposing Ebunolu Akintade and fake DMCAs
In addressing the challenge of removing undesirable content from review platforms and Google search results, businesses often employ various strategies. Due to the legal safeguards protecting freedom of speech in the United States, legitimate avenues for such removal are limited. Negative reviews and associated search results cannot be eliminated by businesses unless a valid claim of defamation, copyright infringement, or another explicit violation of the law is present.
Confronted by these constraints, certain companies, exemplified by Ebunolu Akintade, have resorted to fraudulent tactics, such as falsely asserting copyright ownership over adverse reviews with the aim of having them taken down.
Instances of powerful individuals engaging in criminal activities have been targeted with fabricated DMCA notices in an attempt to conceal their unlawful actions. These individuals, encompassing politicians from the United States, Russia, and Kazakhstan, as well as members of influential circles including the mafia and those with substantial financial clout, appear to be interconnected. Allegations of corruption, ranging from child abuse to sexual harassment, come to light when examining evidence discovered at these URLs. The extent of influence exerted raises concerns that warrant further investigation before justice can be rightfully served.
Potential Consequences for Ebunolu Akintade
Under Florida Statute 831.01, the commission of Forgery occurs when an individual falsifies, alters, counterfeits, or forges a document with “legal efficacy” intending to injure or defraud another person or entity.
Forgery, classified as a white-collar crime, entails the alteration, modification, or change of a document to deceive another person. This offense may also involve the distribution of copies of known false documents. In several states, including Florida, document falsification is a felony offense.
Furthermore, within the framework of Florida law, “fraud on the court” is described as when “a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense” (Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), quoting Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989)).
The crime of Forgery is a Third Degree Felony in Florida and is punishable by up to five (5) years in prison, five (5) years of probation, and a $5,000 fine.
